Over two years ago, Tata Motors launched the Nano in India, a car priced at around $2000 that was expected to revolutionise the domestic passenger car market. I remember telling a friend, who was in the US at that time on a project, with a lot of pride, "Obama is also talking about the Nano. Tata has done us all so proud." My friend joked, "Ask Obama if he would like to ride the Nano. This car won't even pass the stringent security tests in the US. You should see the cars on display at the Detroit Auto Show." It seems, these days, even Indians don't like the Nano, let alone Americans! The company has been reporting very disappointing sales in recent times: Nano sales slumped 29% in June this year to just 5451 units. But, other car makers such as Maruti Suzuki, Hyundai and Toyota (even other Tata brands), are doing well. Somewhere amidst the fanfare, both domestic and international, Tata lost its marketing plot and maybe even assumed that the Nano was an automatic success. Let us analyse the marketing weaknesses with the 5 C model:
Company - Tata Motors is associated with high quality cars and commercial vehicles. Technological innovation that helps to cut down cost and make vehicles affordable is also a key feature of the company. The company owns luxury car brands such as Jaguar and Land Rover, implying that Tata operates at both price spectrums of the car industry.
The problem that Tata faced in marketing the Nano was the excessive focus on the 'cheapness' of the car and not the high degree of innovation, superior design and engineering excellence that went into it. Suddenly, prospective customers were being bombarded with TV advertisements, posters and emails talking about 'low price' and not sufficiently about the other important features. They wanted to know whether Tata was lending its name to a good quality car and not just cutting corners by offering a 'cheap' car.
Competitors - Tata faces stiff competition in the Indian market from Maruti Suzuki, Hyundai, Toyota and a few other German manufacturers. The other companies offer low-cost hatchbacks but not quite as cheap as Nano. But, the cars are of high quality in terms of convenience, fuel economy and security and are usually lapped up by consumers even at higher prices. Tata's marketing weakness was the excessive focus on 'price' and not on other features such as fuel economy and security.
Customers - Indian customers are hard to please, especially if you are offering a 'cheap' product. They are highly aspirational and if they are convinced about the features of a product, they will go for it even at a higher price. Tata was forced to recall a huge number of Nanos and pay full compensation when the cars started catching fire shortly after launch. Customers started doubting the security features and lost faith in the product. Given that the company faced manufacturing delays and high raw material costs, customers began to doubt the marketing campaigns and whether Tata was cutting corners just to keep the price low.
Collaborators - Tata collaborated with a number of car parts suppliers and initially purchased various components at a low price. But, trouble started when component costs started shooting up due to high global prices of the raw materials used in the components. Reports started trickling in that Tata was having problems in controlling costs with price of components going northwards. Given that the Nano marketing campaigns focussed so much on just 'price', the whole low-cost model went astray and led to doubts among prospective customers.
Context - PESTLE analysis
Political - NA
i. Economic - Tata's intention was good, a low-cost car focussing on first-time buyers and motorbike riders. But, the excessive focus on 'low cost' was a marketing weakness.
ii. Social - Indian customers are highly aspirational and look for good quality (convenience, fuel economy, security) and not just low price. Nano marketing campaigns' price focus alienated customers.
iii. Technological - Nano was made after months of research and technological innovation. Superior design was the hallmark of the car such as putting the engine at the back to make it more spacious for taller people. However, marketing campaigns failed to sufficiently convey the message about quality, convenience and security.
iv. Legal - NA
v. Environmental - Some activists were initially concerned what effect a cheap car would have on the level of pollution. However, this did not have any major effect on the car's marketing and prospects because the Nano's influence on India's car penetration levels and the overall effect on the passenger car market were main focus areas.
The Nano could possibly register better sales going forward but it's not likely to be substantial. Tata has not been able to market the Nano properly. Competitors are rolling out new products each month which are of sufficiently high quality though not as cheap as the Nano: even Tata is coming out with pricier cars. Motorbike riders (and other first-time buyers) would rather ride their bikes as of now or purchase a 'better' car with a car loan rather than be viewed as the owners of the world's 'cheapest' car. Times are certainly tough for the Nano!
Company - Tata Motors is associated with high quality cars and commercial vehicles. Technological innovation that helps to cut down cost and make vehicles affordable is also a key feature of the company. The company owns luxury car brands such as Jaguar and Land Rover, implying that Tata operates at both price spectrums of the car industry.
The problem that Tata faced in marketing the Nano was the excessive focus on the 'cheapness' of the car and not the high degree of innovation, superior design and engineering excellence that went into it. Suddenly, prospective customers were being bombarded with TV advertisements, posters and emails talking about 'low price' and not sufficiently about the other important features. They wanted to know whether Tata was lending its name to a good quality car and not just cutting corners by offering a 'cheap' car.
Competitors - Tata faces stiff competition in the Indian market from Maruti Suzuki, Hyundai, Toyota and a few other German manufacturers. The other companies offer low-cost hatchbacks but not quite as cheap as Nano. But, the cars are of high quality in terms of convenience, fuel economy and security and are usually lapped up by consumers even at higher prices. Tata's marketing weakness was the excessive focus on 'price' and not on other features such as fuel economy and security.
Customers - Indian customers are hard to please, especially if you are offering a 'cheap' product. They are highly aspirational and if they are convinced about the features of a product, they will go for it even at a higher price. Tata was forced to recall a huge number of Nanos and pay full compensation when the cars started catching fire shortly after launch. Customers started doubting the security features and lost faith in the product. Given that the company faced manufacturing delays and high raw material costs, customers began to doubt the marketing campaigns and whether Tata was cutting corners just to keep the price low.
Collaborators - Tata collaborated with a number of car parts suppliers and initially purchased various components at a low price. But, trouble started when component costs started shooting up due to high global prices of the raw materials used in the components. Reports started trickling in that Tata was having problems in controlling costs with price of components going northwards. Given that the Nano marketing campaigns focussed so much on just 'price', the whole low-cost model went astray and led to doubts among prospective customers.
Context - PESTLE analysis
Political - NA
i. Economic - Tata's intention was good, a low-cost car focussing on first-time buyers and motorbike riders. But, the excessive focus on 'low cost' was a marketing weakness.
ii. Social - Indian customers are highly aspirational and look for good quality (convenience, fuel economy, security) and not just low price. Nano marketing campaigns' price focus alienated customers.
iii. Technological - Nano was made after months of research and technological innovation. Superior design was the hallmark of the car such as putting the engine at the back to make it more spacious for taller people. However, marketing campaigns failed to sufficiently convey the message about quality, convenience and security.
iv. Legal - NA
v. Environmental - Some activists were initially concerned what effect a cheap car would have on the level of pollution. However, this did not have any major effect on the car's marketing and prospects because the Nano's influence on India's car penetration levels and the overall effect on the passenger car market were main focus areas.
The Nano could possibly register better sales going forward but it's not likely to be substantial. Tata has not been able to market the Nano properly. Competitors are rolling out new products each month which are of sufficiently high quality though not as cheap as the Nano: even Tata is coming out with pricier cars. Motorbike riders (and other first-time buyers) would rather ride their bikes as of now or purchase a 'better' car with a car loan rather than be viewed as the owners of the world's 'cheapest' car. Times are certainly tough for the Nano!